![]() On the other hand, people still argue the film is still overcrowded, with neither Harry, Brock or Flint Marko given the full time they needed. so it's not like there was anything wrong with the concept itself. Additionally, several well-received Marvel superhero films that came after this one also featured three or more supervillains, note Such as Batroc, Armin Zola, Crossbones, Winter Soldier, and Alexander Pierce in Captain America: The Winter Soldier, Bolivar Trask, Mystique, and Magneto in X-Men: Days of Future Past, or M'Baku, Ulysses Klaue, and Kilmonger in Black Panther. While pointed out by most to be the single biggest flaw in the movie, some critics have argued that, with the film serving as the conclusion of Harry's character arc, requiring him to commit a Heel≯ace Turn to join with Peter, neither Sandman nor Venom alone would be a sufficient threat to oppose both Spider-Man and Neo Goblin, with the final 2-on-2 battle providing the best balance in a sense, the film doesn't actually have three villains, but two villains and one secondary hero who fights against the lead for some of it. Also, the issue of whether the film has "too many villains".The editor's cut is also controversial in this regard as some hate that the "Emo Peter" montage was kept in at all, while others appreciate that it was given a darker context since it now immediately follows Peter throwing a bomb at Harry and hideously scarring him, emphasizing his sociopathic callousness as much as his geekiness. Defenders claim that he's supposed to be super lame and just thinks he's being awesome, while detractors cite the fact that the majority of characters respond positively to Peter's change like he's actually being cool, and also point out that the way Peter acts under the symbiote's influence is not true to the comics portrayal of Peter under the symbiote's influence and thus shouldn't be acting this way at all. Want to start an argument? Ask if Peter's behavior under the symbiote's influence is bad or brilliant.Connors trying to tell him the effects that bonding with the Symbiote might have on him and him striking MJ at the Jazz Club. Or anything that Emo Peter does between Dr. Big-Lipped Alligator Moment: The dance scene.It reinforces the belief many hold that there is a good movie buried inside here, it just got bogged down with all the Executive Meddling. Better on DVD: The film had an altered yet shorter and improved version called Spider-Man 3: Editor's Cut with restored music and better focus on character development.It's a brilliant dark parallel to Spider-Man's Leitmotif note which is also the trilogy's main theme - while Spidey's theme is heroic, often having a sense of tranquility and tragedy reflecting his Dark and Troubled Past, Venom's theme is dark and villainous, with a sense of anger and detest slowly rising, before culminating in a fit of rage - reflecting Venom's hatred towards Spider-Man after he humiliated Eddie and rejected the symbiote. Sandman's theme is widely regarded as a beautiful piece of music.Christopher Young's rendition of Danny Elfman's theme for the film is excellent, being darker and more dramatic than the original, particularly after the 1:20 mark.This also might have happened anyway according to Word of God, as Harry was apparently hallucinating him being there as part of remembering the evidence and realizing the truth. Author's Saving Throw: The Editor's Cut version of the movie outright cuts out the much-panned scene where Harry's butler convinces Harry to help Peter save MJ by only just NOW revealing to him that he had proof of Norman dying by his own hand, and instead has Harry make his choice all by himself, making his role in the film's climax much more powerful. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |